Date: 2011-06-12 01:11 am (UTC)
They actually screen *and* pasteurize usually. It does change the nutrients somewhat and removes many of the immune factors, but since a lot of milk banks are primarily for premature babies and other infants in the NICU they
tend to be super cautious. It is still far, far easier for an infant to digest and obtain nutrition from than any other source, which is particularly a concern with extra-fragile infants.

Pasteurization will kill pretty much any microbes of concern if done properly, regardless of the mammal from which the milk originated. It will not, however, probably remove or neutralize any problematic medication that
transfers into the milk. (There aren't many that do in quantities sufficient to be an issue for most newborns, let alone anyone older, and I have the list generally used as a guideline by lactation related professionals. This
reminds me, however, that I need to tactfully screen for that.)

It will also make the milk spoil much more quickly than raw milk does (as it removes the factors that inhibit bacterial growth), hence ideally it would be pasteurized close to the point it was actually turned into ice-cream.

I personally wouldn't consider pasteurized milk from any mammal to be a form of fluid bonding, but folks might want to consider their own comfort levels and definitions.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
678 9101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 02:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios